🔗 Share this article Tehran Says It Might Return to American Atomic Negotiations if Approached with 'Respect' and 'Honor' Iran is prepared to restart nuclear discussions with the United States provided that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared. The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared new appeals had been made by go-betweens to resume negotiations with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access struck enrichment centers for security reasons. Navigating a Difficult Route The foreign minister is walking a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be proceeding from a position of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more powerful defensively and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June. He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the previous talks. Prior Talks Unexpectedly Ended The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that concluded with the US president declaring the locations had been destroyed. Following this, European countries employed their right to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact. Magic Solution Suggested Iran's diplomats said they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was decided an local partnership with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful. It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington". Existing Situation Tehran representatives said the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the offer could be revived in various formats if talks resume. The US president recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from the United States either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a show. Political Stance In his remarks to the forum, intended to paint the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the notion of international law, Araghchi declared the 12-day war revealed the dispute could not be ended by military means. He stated the strikes started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an absolute demand for a ceasefire. Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust challenging to restore. Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Answer The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the European states that had always attempted to enforce their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and stays the primary solution to address disputes, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be followed." "If they address to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and respect, they will get a reply in the same language." Repair and Reconstruction In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the conflict of restoration and recovery, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We acquired many lessons from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy." He stated: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and gear, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is important is the determination of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have developed more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this attack."